A Comparative Study of Ranking-based Semantics for Abstract Argumentation

02/02/2016
by   Elise Bonzon, et al.
0

Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them consists in using a ranking-based semantics which rank-order arguments from the most to the least acceptable ones. Recently, a number of such semantics have been proposed independently, often associated with some desirable properties. However, there is no comparative study which takes a broader perspective. This is what we propose in this work. We provide a general comparison of all these semantics with respect to the proposed properties. That allows to underline the differences of behavior between the existing semantics.

READ FULL TEXT

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset