Backgammon is Hard

06/30/2021
by   R. Teal Witter, et al.
0

We study the computational complexity of the popular board game backgammon. We show that deciding whether a player can win from a given board configuration is NP-Hard, PSPACE-Hard, and EXPTIME-Hard under different settings of known and unknown opponents' strategies and dice rolls. Our work answers an open question posed by Erik Demaine in 2001. In particular, for the real life setting where the opponent's strategy and dice rolls are unknown, we prove that determining whether a player can win is EXPTIME-Hard. Interestingly, it is not clear what complexity class strictly contains each problem we consider because backgammon games can theoretically continue indefinitely as a result of the capture rule.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
03/14/2022

Computational Complexity of Multi-Player Evolutionarily Stable Strategies

In this paper we study the computational complexity of computing an evol...
research
11/21/2022

Celeste is PSPACE-hard

We investigate the complexity of the platform video game Celeste. We pro...
research
07/11/2017

A simple proof that the (n^2-1)-puzzle is hard

The 15 puzzle is a classic reconfiguration puzzle with fifteen uniquely ...
research
10/17/2020

Mad Science is Provably Hard: Puzzles in Hearthstone's Boomsday Lab are NP-hard

We consider the computational complexity of winning this turn (mate-in-1...
research
03/11/2020

Magic: the Gathering is as Hard as Arithmetic

Magic: the Gathering is a popular and famously complicated card game abo...
research
09/26/2019

How hard is it to predict sandpiles on lattices? A survey

Since their introduction in the 80s, sandpile models have raised interes...
research
03/30/2022

Wordle is NP-hard

Wordle is a single-player word-guessing game where the goal is to discov...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset