Fine-grained Complexity Meets IP = PSPACE

05/07/2018
by   Lijie Chen, et al.
0

In this paper we study the fine-grained complexity of finding exact and approximate solutions to problems in P. Our main contribution is showing reductions from exact to approximate solution for a host of such problems. As one (notable) example, we show that the Closest-LCS-Pair problem (Given two sets of strings A and B, compute exactly the maximum LCS(a, b) with (a, b) ∈ A × B) is equivalent to its approximation version (under near-linear time reductions, and with a constant approximation factor). More generally, we identify a class of problems, which we call BP-Pair-Class, comprising both exact and approximate solutions, and show that they are all equivalent under near-linear time reductions. Exploring this class and its properties, we also show: ∙ Under the NC-SETH assumption (a significantly more relaxed assumption than SETH), solving any of the problems in this class requires essentially quadratic time. ∙ Modest improvements on the running time of known algorithms (shaving log factors) would imply that NEXP is not in non-uniform NC^1. ∙ Finally, we leverage our techniques to show new barriers for deterministic approximation algorithms for LCS. At the heart of these new results is a deep connection between interactive proof systems for bounded-space computations and the fine-grained complexity of exact and approximate solutions to problems in P. In particular, our results build on the proof techniques from the classical IP = PSPACE result.

READ FULL TEXT

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset